Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 1,285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Carpenter results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 1,013 hits . Analysis detected 7,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,855 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,257 of 6,296 authors). This Amanda Carpenter is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Amanda Carpenter
Author details
Total words: 3,855
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.0% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.3% 26.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.1% 24.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.5% 8.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 24.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 11.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst