Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Conduct results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,393 hits. Analysis detected 12,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,048 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,958 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Conduct is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Conduct
Topic details
Total words: 8,048
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos