Topic summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos1,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Appointments results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 711 hits. Analysis detected 5,376 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,695 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Appointments is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Presidential Appointments
Topic details
Total words: 5,624
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos