Topic summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video2,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Preservation Of History results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 755 hits. Analysis detected 4,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,330 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,293 of 16,562 topics). This Preservation Of History is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Preservation Of History
Topic details
Total words: 6,330
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos