Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pregnancy Style results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 529 hits. Analysis detected 2,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,168 of 16,562 topics). This Pregnancy Style is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Pregnancy Style
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos