Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Precision Medicine results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Bandwagon, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 1,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (5,223 of 22,633 topics). This Precision Medicine is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Precision Medicine
Topic details
Total words: 1,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos