Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prayer results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 2,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,710 of 15,689 topics). This Prayer is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Prayer
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠70%Prayer (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,064
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.6%22.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos