Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pottery Studio Closure results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 835 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,477 of 16,562 topics). This Pottery Studio Closure is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Pottery Studio Closure
Topic details
Total words: 1,952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos