Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Porsche results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 2,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,157 of 16,562 topics). This Porsche is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Porsche
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,672
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos