Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Populist Movement results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Recency Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 576 hits . Analysis detected 4,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,893 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Populist Movement is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Populist Movement
Topic details
Total words: 4,893
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst