Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Population Trends results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 426 hits . Analysis detected 2,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,576 of 16,562 topics). This Population Trends is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. Population Trends
Topic details
Total words: 4,100
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst