Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pop Tarts Bowl results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 954 hits. Analysis detected 8,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,462 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,309 of 15,769 topics). This Pop Tarts Bowl is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Pop Tarts Bowl
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,462
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.4%17.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.8%11.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos