Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pop Surrealism results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 3,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,033 of 16,562 topics). This Pop Surrealism is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Pop Surrealism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,882
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.7% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.8%19.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.9%14.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos