Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marina Watanabe results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 373 hits . Analysis detected 3,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 88% (843 of 6,628 authors). This Marina Watanabe is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Marina Watanabe
Author details
Total words: 1,882
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.3% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.8% 19.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.3% 14.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.9% 14.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 19.8% 19.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 19.8%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst