Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pop Culture Analysis results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 599 hits. Analysis detected 3,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,766 of 16,562 topics). This Pop Culture Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Pop Culture Analysis
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠66%Pop Culture Analysis (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,808
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.3%21.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos