Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Polo results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 595 hits . Analysis detected 2,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,251 topics). This Polo is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Polo
Topic details
Total words: 3,084
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 19.3% 19.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst