Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pollinators results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 375 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,551 of 15,755 topics). This Pollinators is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Pollinators
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos