Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Politics In Sports results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 1,154 hits. Analysis detected 3,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,510 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Politics In Sports is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Politics In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 3,510
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.9%32.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Tu Quoque: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos