Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Politicas De Inmigracion results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,519 topics). This Politicas De Inmigracion is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Politicas De Inmigracion
Topic details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos