Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Political Weaponization results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 762 hits. Analysis detected 5,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,753 topics). This Political Weaponization is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Political Weaponization
Topic details
Total words: 3,768
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 19.2%19.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.2%20.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos