Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Stunts results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,653 of 16,562 topics). This Political Stunts is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Political Stunts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.5%26.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.7%7.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.8%20.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos