Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Stunts results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 371 hits . Analysis detected 2,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,653 of 16,562 topics). This Political Stunts is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group. Political Stunts
Topic details
Total words: 1,400
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 26.5% 26.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 20.8% 20.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.1%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst