Topic summary
⁠46%3 analyzed articles/videos895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Nominations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 2,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,580 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (12,383 of 22,526 topics). This Political Nominations is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Political Nominations
Topic details
Total words: 3,580
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos