Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Memes results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 495 hits . Analysis detected 2,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,960 of 16,562 topics). This Political Memes is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Political Memes
Topic details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.1% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 32.0% 32.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.7% 24.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 21.6% 21.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Tu Quoque: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% No True Scotsman: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst