Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Influencer results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 908 hits. Analysis detected 4,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,652 of 15,341 topics). This Political Influencer is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Political Influencer
Topic details
Total words: 2,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.8%31.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos