Topic summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Hearings results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Straw Man, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 72.2% saturation with 1,117 hits. Analysis detected 5,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,209 of 16,562 topics). This Political Hearings is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Political Hearings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.7% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 72.2%72.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 43.7%43.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 34.0%34.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.3%20.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.4%17.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.1%8.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 72.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 43.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 34.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos