Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video1,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Grudges results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 947 hits. Analysis detected 8,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,994 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,231 of 16,562 topics). This Political Grudges is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Political Grudges
Topic details
Total words: 5,994
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos