Topic summary
49% 4 analyzed articles/videos 646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Figures results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 691 hits . Analysis detected 6,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,400 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,802 of 16,562 topics). This Political Figures is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Political Figures
Topic details
Total words: 5,400
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst