Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Carter results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 114 hits . Analysis detected 861 faulty-reasoning hits from 752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (615 of 6,628 authors). This Christian Carter is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Christian Carter
Author details
Total words: 752
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.7% percentile 7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles752 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 12.5% 12.5% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.2% 15.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 12.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.3%, sitewide 9.1% Red Herring: Author 10.6%, sitewide 0.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Primacy Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst