Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Political Disputes results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Political Disputes is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Political Disputes
Topic details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Tu Quoque: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst