Topic summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos4,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Development results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,537 hits. Analysis detected 14,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,544 of 16,562 topics). This Political Development is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Political Development
Topic details
Total words: 14,880
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.1%7.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos