Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Political Conferences results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 1,900 hits. Analysis detected 8,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Political Conferences is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Political Conferences
Topic details
Total words: 3,928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 48.4%48.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 43.2%43.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.6%13.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 48.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 43.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos