Topic summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Candidates results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 244 hits . Analysis detected 1,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,037 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,544 of 16,562 topics). This Political Candidates is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Political Candidates
Topic details
Total words: 2,037
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst