Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Art results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,428 hits. Analysis detected 6,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,525 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,370 of 15,847 topics). This Political Art is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Political Art
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠41%Political Art (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 6,525
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.9%21.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos