Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Action Committees results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 1,649 hits . Analysis detected 6,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,518 of 16,558 topics). This Political Action Committees is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Political Action Committees
Topic details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.8% percentile 6.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 45.5% 45.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 35.2% 35.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 21.5% 21.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 45.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 35.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst