Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Policing For Profit results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 964 faulty-reasoning hits from 816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,619 of 16,562 topics). This Policing For Profit is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Policing For Profit
Topic details
Total words: 816
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.2% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles816 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.7%15.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.1%19.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos