Topic summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Community Relations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 666 hits . Analysis detected 5,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,351 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,350 of 16,562 topics). This Police Community Relations is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Police Community Relations
Topic details
Total words: 6,351
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst