Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Podcast Interview results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 250 hits . Analysis detected 1,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 736 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,126 of 16,562 topics). This Podcast Interview is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Podcast Interview
Topic details
Total words: 736
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.2% percentile 10.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles736 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 27.6% 27.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 22.4% 22.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 34.0% 34.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 34.0%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst