Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeannie Yandel results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anchoring Bias , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 158 hits . Analysis detected 1,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 438 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of 97% (200 of 6,628 authors). This Jeannie Yandel is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. Jeannie Yandel
Author details
Total words: 438
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.0% percentile 13.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles438 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 36.1% 36.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 33.8% 33.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 18.7% 18.7% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 14.4% 14.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.5% 13.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.8% 14.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Author 36.1%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 33.8%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 18.7%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 14.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 13.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 12.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Composition/Division: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst