Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video2,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Playstation Gaming results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 1,731 hits. Analysis detected 5,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,094 of 16,562 topics). This Playstation Gaming is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Playstation Gaming
Topic details
Total words: 6,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.0%26.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos