Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video1,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Analysis results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 741 hits. Analysis detected 3,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,349 of 16,562 topics). This Player Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Player Analysis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,428
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos