Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Plant Closure And Local Economic Impact results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 49.1% saturation with 1,293 hits. Analysis detected 6,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,631 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,240 of 16,562 topics). This Plant Closure And Local Economic Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Plant Closure And Local Economic Impact
Topic details
Total words: 2,631
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.5% percentile
10.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 49.1%49.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 37.2%37.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 41.7%41.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.0%12.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 49.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 41.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 37.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos