Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Plant Based Diet results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 3,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,510 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,550 of 16,494 topics). This Plant Based Diet is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Plant Based Diet
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,510
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos