Topic summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pipeline Safety results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 1,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,102 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,600 of 21,170 topics). This Pipeline Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Pipeline Safety
Topic details
Total words: 3,102
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst