Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video1,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pipeline Regulation results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (15,880 of 21,170 topics). This Pipeline Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Pipeline Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 5,048
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos