Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pipeline Controversy results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Pipeline Controversy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pipeline Controversy
Topic details
Total words: 1,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos