Topic summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philanthropic Foundations results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 387 hits . Analysis detected 3,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,606 of 16,237 topics). This Philanthropic Foundations is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Philanthropic Foundations
Topic details
Total words: 4,348
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst