Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philadelphia Parking Authority results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,929 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,165 of 15,887 topics). This Philadelphia Parking Authority is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Philadelphia Parking Authority
Topic details
Total words: 1,929
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos