Topic summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philadelphia Eagles results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 2,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,934 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,507 of 16,562 topics). This Philadelphia Eagles is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Philadelphia Eagles
Topic details
Total words: 2,934
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos