Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video483 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Petroleum Refining results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 425 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (13,612 of 20,863 topics). This Petroleum Refining is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Petroleum Refining
Topic details
Total words: 1,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos