Topic summary
⁠31%3 analyzed articles/videos1,624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pet Health results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 963 hits. Analysis detected 7,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,935 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,359 of 15,762 topics). This Pet Health is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Pet Health
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,935
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos